1/22/2024 0 Comments Mental after effects of covid 19Large-scale public quarantine or home-isolation has had a significant effect on the public's mental health, with panic and psychological pressure being experienced each day from the media reports on the number of new cases ( Rubin and Wessely, 2020). Quarantine has been used for centuries as an effective preventative measure to deal with infectious disease outbreaks such as cholera and plague ( Brooks et al., 2020 TWU et al., 2003 Mandavilli, 2003 Barbera, 2001). While medical quarantine isolates the infected from the uninfected, self-quarantine and social distancing measures seek to block the spread of disease in the community ( Gensini et al., 2004). Different from traditional medical quarantine, home quarantine and social distancing required all people to self-quarantine and observe social distancing rules in specified places for a certain period of time. To control the spread during the COVID-19 pandemic, many countries implemented home quarantine and/or social distancing. The traditional medical reason for isolation was to limit the activities of groups that may have been exposed to an infectious disease by separating those with the disease from those who did not have the disease to reduce the risk of infecting others ( CDC 2017). Quarantine was first used for people with leprosy in Venice, Italy in 1127, and was widely used to deal with the Black Death in the 1300s however, it was not until the 1600s that Britain began to isolate people with the plague ( Newman et al., 2012). Therefore, from a policy point of view, understanding the impact of this pandemic on public mental health and life satisfaction ( Brooks et al., 2020) and elucidating the public's mental health concerns under mass quarantine measures could provide a valuable reference for the best ways to prevent infections in countries in which the COVID-19 situation is serious. In particular, when in a long-term quarantine situation, many people developed negative emotions such as anxiety, depression, frustration, and the psychological panic caused by negative news. Three months after the initial outbreak, many people in many countries were still unable to work or exercise as normal, and the pandemic had not only resulted in significant global deaths, but had given rise to mental health problems such as stress and anxiety in both COVID-19 patients and unaffected healthy citizens ( Duan and Zhu, 2020 Roy and Tripathy, 2020). As of April, China's home quarantine initiative had received positive feedback and had been successful in curbing the COVID-19 transmission, which was consequently praised by the World Health Organization. To control community spread of the pandemic, China promulgated restrictive "unprecedented public health" nationwide home quarantine measures ( Li et al., 2020 Wang et al., 2020). To isolate the COVID-19 transmission, many countries have required citizens who may have been exposed to the virus to self-isolate either at home or in professional quarantine facilities. The results indicated that: COVID-19 quarantine had varying impacts on individual anxiety, depression, and psychological stress different groups had different regulatory effects on the relationship between quarantine and mental health and country of origin had no moderating effect on quarantine and psychology.Ĭoronavirus-19 (COVID-19) has been a global public health crisis in 2020 ( Getty et al., 2020). Finally, a sub-group test was used to explore whether the sampling group and the country of origin had a moderating effect on the relationship between quarantine and mental health, which revealed that the relationship between quarantine and mental health was regulated and influenced by the sampled objects but was not affected by the country categories. First, a heterogeneity test and sensitivity analysis were conducted to determine whether there was heterogeneity in the samples, after which a funnel chart, Rosenthal's Classic Fail-safe N test and Egger's test were applied to further determine whether there was publication bias in the included samples. As the relationship between quarantine and mental health was found to be affected by the sampling objects and national factors, a random-effects model was applied for the meta-analysis. To reveal the complex relationships between quarantine and mental health during COVID-19, a meta-analysis was conducted involving 34 articles and a total sample size of 134,061.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |